---

Q u o t e:
Five categories of change in game:

1. A buff to YOU.
2. A nerf to YOU.
3. A buff to another.
4. A nerf to another.
5. A change that does not affect your gameplay experience in any meaningful way.

(1) -- Blizzard connected with your part of community and listened to your 'wise words'.
(2) -- Blizzard connected with community and listened.... to their QQ about you.
(3) -- Blizzard did not connect with community and OMG this happened.
(4) -- Blizzard connected with community and listened to their 'wise words'.
(5) -- Who cares?


Two categories of NO change in game:

1. A needed buff to you did not happen.
2. A needed nerf to another did not happen.

(1) -- Blizzard did not connect with your part of the community... they no listen OMG!
(2) -- Blizzard did not connect with your part of the community... they no listen OMG!


So, we have a total of 3xConnected and 3xUnconnected, for an even balance.

All is well.

---

---

Q u o t e:
OP given the experiences with ret in WotLK and TBC I think the devs do listen. They are just on a completely different time scale to us.

For a player if you spec is broken, or not fixed, one patch to the next then that is huge. You can go months or years needing a fix.

But the devs seem to balance only around patches. They are on a longer timescale than us. They might see what is coming in the next patch and decide that a class can wait. Or they may be working on bringing a class up a little each patch until they are balanced.

---

---

Q u o t e:
Lets not forget that the "community", represented by the small percentage of players who actually post constructively on the forums is in relation to the total population of the game. So while we can find a problem in the game and address it in a well thought out logically sound manner, it doesn't mean that the experience of the "community" as stated in these forums reflects closely with the data mining done by blizzard of millions of players across dozens of servers.

---

---

Q u o t e:
I sincerely doubt that the developers are disconnected with the community. A large issue is that we have thousands (millions) of man-hours a day contributed to reading, thinking, and posting on these forums (too much time, IMO). The development team has a dozen or so man-hours, I'd guess. Sure, we don't get all that we'd want out of them, but we get more than we deserve.

I think that people should continue to post threads of data, theorycrafting, and (*gasp*) even opinions on the state of their class, and how'd they like to see it improved. I just hate coming here and seeing "ZOMG I posted four parses, and gave you 3 pages of math, and you still won't fix my friggin class?!?!! I give up on this game, KTHXBAI".

If you're truly interested in improving the class, continue to post the parses and opinions, just do it without the attitude and extremism, and the devs will get things going.

---

[ Post edited by Ghostcrawler ]

---

Q u o t e:
Most of the problems within the community are self-induced and stem from a couple of key issues:

1. Attempting to make a case for something you're passionate (ie. pissed off) about:

More often than not any "solution" provided isn't objective at all (except in the mind of the raging player, those of his/her ilk and trolls trying to incite a riot). Just as in arguing with your spouse/friends, if you feel your emotions are running high that is NOT the right time to try and make a strong, logical argument because most likely it will not come out as you intend. This applies to everyone in all aspects of your life.


2. Disconnect between design intent and player expectations:

You can say "it's bad design" till your blue in the face but if you're expecting constant escalating buffs and no abilities with any downside to them then you're setting yourself up for disappointment and will likely embarrass yourself by raging on the forums with a bunch of rhetoric straight out of an 8 year old's playbook.

If you don't agree with something within the game, first try to remain calm, then try to put together a reasonable argument for why you feel like you do. You must support your claims with real data and not anecdotal evidence and rhetoric. In the end, if the developers say: Sorry but... then that's your answer.


3. Players thinking that those who whine/cry/complain the loudest on these forums drive the design philosophy of this game:

In the post I quoted, the irony of this paradigm is mentioned. If there's part of the community lobbying for a change and it (or something related to it) gets implemented, there will be outrage from those the change works against and they'll rage about how he-who-whines-loudest. If nothing is done about the suggestion, then you get "Blizzard doesn't listen to the players." when the fact is that >90% of the "suggested" changes aren't good at all. Many times, it's for reasons you aren't aware of or, more typically, something explained which you don't agree with.


With regard to #3, what DOES happen is this:

---> Player makes a post about a game situation/scenario, many start to comment on it (perhaps even with *GASP* real data that makes sense in the context of the discussion)

--------> GC and his team read the forums constantly and some of the points made within the post generates some interest in further exploration. They might chime in and try to guide the conversation with questions/philosophy.

---------------> The dev team pulls and analyzes some data and draws some conclusions. They line up the conclusions with the design intent and if they match, no change is forthcoming. If they do NOT match, then further evaluation is required to brainstorm a list of changes and settle on the best available option. Almost no change will not have repercussions for other classes/abilities/synergy/et al so this requires time, effort and most importantly, testing.

In closing, it's not the developers job to educate you on everything which goes on in the game - if you don't like it, vote with your subscription dollars. They tolerate more than they should, in my opinion.

If you're really interested in helping, providing conclusions based on data and taking a neutral tone in presenting your case will go a long way.

---

---

Q u o t e:
To them we aren't people. We are account numbers. You, I , all of us are account#X in a pool of millions. They do not give a rats arse about you as an individual or your $15.00.

The disconnect is that players feel as paying customers we deserve answers. To Blizzard we are playing their game as evidenced in GCs post and should feel honored to do so. They are the Rock Stars, we are the groupies.

---

---

Q u o t e:
So basically anyone who absolves the devs of any responsibility for game imbalances gets quoted?

---

---

Q u o t e:
I mean, all people are asking for is a little explanation as to why the devs feel the way they do about shadow priests and why it is so at odds with what the evidence seems to say.

---

---

Q u o t e:
I get the different time scale, but if the majority of players are seeing something vastly different than what the developers are seeing, at what point does it become enough for them to realize a problem exists and to fix it? I get that classes can't be looked at as single entities when it comes to balance, and that if one really is lagging behind the others, they may be forced to stay that way since bringing them back in line would imbalance the game from a pve or pvp standpoint(without further adjusting the current content, which eats up probably more development time than they have since they always have to pump out new content), but at what point does it simply become unfair to the community as a whole because a fix has to be a long way off for the greater good?

---

---

Q u o t e:
How do you expect us to take it at your word when we have REAL LIVE experiences every single day that go against that? I mean experiences that actually AFFECT our real raiding experience, our community, our guild, our $15 a month. You guys may say one thing and want us to trust you, but the fact is that shadow priests are frustrated.

---

[ Post edited by Ghostcrawler ]

---

Q u o t e:
From a marketing perspective, I'm somewhat shocked he's allowed to post. These forums are terrible for making the player base happy, though I suppose that ignores the purpose of these forums. If the purpose is indeed to have a place for the community to come and discuss things, then that's great - it achieves its purpose.

---

---

Q u o t e:
Which just makes me ask why you bother hosting a forum at all.... it's just a venue for you to come and say that you're going to do what your design goals dictate, player anecdotal experiences be damned. Honestly, most people that play don't give a !!!# about the numbers.

---

---

Q u o t e:
He'll never post any beneficial posts in any shadow thread, because he's totally ignorant of the class. Its 100% obvious him and the dev team doesn't play 1. Nor do the scale raid dungeons with shadow priest in mind. I'm really wanting to know how can I improve my dmg to the level he thinks we're capable of, but he won't because he can't.

I just wish he would just admit it to player-base, he's ignorant of the class, and really doesn't want to do anything more with Shadow. Just go spec disc/holy, cause we don't tune raids with the spec in mind. Then players can either 1. Quit or 2. re-roll to a raid needed spec.

---

---

Q u o t e:

I finally got fed up of cop outs and deafening silence after all these years and rerolled.

---

---

Q u o t e:
3.3 patch notes are out and nothing of note for shadow DPS. To all of us who went from top of the charts in Naxx, to middle in Ulduar, to bottom in ToC - where do you think we'll be in Icecrown? With the way our damage has been scaling with gear relative to other classes, that should put us somewhere right around the tanks :(

---

---

Q u o t e:
Hooray, another Sunwell. I might as well just put on my T6 and run around Icecrown with Zhar'doom. I'll be about as effective, yet look so much cooler.

---