|
  Design Q&A |
07/19/09 10:37:24 PM
Patch 3.1.3
Venaliter |
Dear Crab, Sir.
I know your a busy man, but I just wanted to compile a quick thread
that hopefully warrants a response from you. I'll make it brief. I
tried to compile a thread filled with some questions we've had some
answers on, but heard nothing about recently or would like some
clarification on. This thread won't focus on any particular class
but general design of the game. I think it'll be worth your time to
read and hopefully you'll enlighten the community with your
thoughts.
Question #1: Pure VS Hybrid DPS
I think the community as a whole understands and accepts the fact
pure DPS classes need to do the most damage due to the
inflexibility of their roles. My question is there is a large gap
between certain hybrids and their counterparts in other specs.
Currently, DK's and Feral cats compete almost, but not quite, with
the pure dps classes. In no particular order, priests, moonkins,
ret paladins, shamans, warriors lag significantly behind, or, at
least currently in 3.1. I know you have taken steps to curb feral
DPS, and you have removed some of the "Splash" damage of DK AoE,
but is it your intent to bring DKs/Feral cats DOWN to the other
hybrids, or bring the other hybrids UP closer to the to their
kitty/death knight counterparts?
Question #2 Caster DPS VS Melee DPS in PvP:
Even the most jaded of melee classes will admit ( I hope) they are
dominating in PvP, which the possible exception of frost mages. In
this author's view, it is because mages have the ability, much more
so then any other class, to "open the gap" and prevent the melees
from making contact. I've seen from your previous responses you
don't want to have every other class have warmed over or simply
reprinted mage skills, and I know I personally agree with you. But
I think it's fair to say a little tweaking needs to be done to the
casting dps classes, specifically, to make them not want to pound
their desks in frustration. I know you don't want to give everyone
Frost Nova, but it seems casters, from warlocks to shadowpriests to
moonkins, desperately need a way to get out of the speeding truck
we call melee.
Question #3 Spellpower Plate
I'd have to say a good 80% of the people who raid WoW are really,
really sick of spellpower plate dropping in raids. When SP plate
drops one spec of one class can use this, which means you have 29
out of 30 disappointed specs. God forbid two pieces of spell power
plate drop from the same boss. The oft-suggested and effective fix
would probably have a passive talent trainable by Paladins to
convert Attack Power into Spellpower. I realize this would take
some rebalancing of Paladins, ensuring Holy Paladins had
mana(converted from Strength?) and roughly equivalent spellpower to
heal. The talents Sheath of Light and Guided by the Light would
probably need to be adjusted and maybe those spots in the talent
trees might be a good place, and this is just me brainstorming, to
have prot paladins run a little faster (they hardly need more
threat or another tanking CD, come 3.2) and give Ret paladins an
interrupt that they do honestly need.
Edit: It's not so much that paladins, if this change was
implemented, would be rolling on DK/Ret paladin gear, they would
more be rolling on haste/Crit plate gear, which isn't optimized
except for one, possibly two specs. It would just be the same plate
could be used by every plate wearing class and be a possible
upgrade.
Question #4: Tri Specs
Give us an inch, we'll ask for a mile. Now that we've had a taste
of the sweet life of dual specs, we realize how useful it is. And,
for this we thank you. But I know there are classes who would like
to experiment with the last tree of their class, or perhaps build a
pure pvp spec without the not-quite compromise of the guild who
require their hybrids to have both specs PvE optimized for raiding.
I don't really think this would totally break your raid style
encounters, do you? Any word on this?
Question #5
My fifth and final question is about haste scal...just kidding. I
don't I would be far wrong in saying the community as a whole would
really like something to do with our achievement points. This would
also make good business sense for you if you set the bar steep
enough. Something unique in game, such as our names written in gold
or perhaps a master ( in my case) priest class tag. Perhaps a
passenger mount that flies or a 2nd hearthstone location. Something
to do with our hard won achievement points I think would be a fun
addition to the game.
Anyway, I hope this thread was a constructive use of forum space
and you find time in your schedule to share with us what you can.
Thanks for stopping by!
[ Post edited by Venaliter
]
|
07/20/09 01:37:31 PM
Patch 3.1.3
Ghostcrawler
<Lead Systems Designer> |
Q u o t e:
Question #1: Pure VS Hybrid DPS
I think the community as a whole understands and accepts the fact
pure DPS classes need to do the most damage due to the
inflexibility of their roles. My question is there is a large gap
between certain hybrids and their counterparts in other specs.
Currently, DK's and Feral cats compete almost, but not quite, with
the pure dps classes. In no particular order, priests, moonkins,
ret paladins, shamans, warriors lag significantly behind, or, at
least currently in 3.1. I know you have taken steps to curb feral
DPS, and you have removed some of the "Splash" damage of DK AoE,
but is it your intent to bring DKs/Feral cats DOWN to the other
hybrids, or bring the other hybrids UP closer to the to their
kitty/death knight counterparts?
DK and Feral dps should both be lower in 3.2 compared to 3.1. A few
other specs received slight buffs, but overall we're pretty happy
with the PvE dps balance. You have to look at a lot of different
boss fights and break the data down in different and relatively
complex ways before you can really stack rank damage done with any
kind of authority. As soon as we add a new boss, it's all going to
change anyway. Nobody's dps seems so low that it's a liability to
bring them. The few damage-oriented specs that are low in PvE have
alternative specs in other trees that work out fine. It's always
going to be the kind of thing we tweak a lot -- it's a process not
a destination.
Q u o t e:
Question #2 Caster DPS VS Melee DPS in PvP:
Even the most jaded of melee classes will admit ( I hope) they are
dominating in PvP, which the possible exception of frost mages. In
this author's view, it is because mages have the ability, much more
so then any other class, to "open the gap" and prevent the melees
from making contact. I've seen from your previous responses you
don't want to have every other class have warmed over or simply
reprinted mage skills, and I know I personally agree with you. But
I think it's fair to say a little tweaking needs to be done to the
casting dps classes, specifically, to make them not want to pound
their desks in frustration. I know you don't want to give everyone
Frost Nova, but it seems casters, from warlocks to shadowpriests to
moonkins, desperately need a way to get out of the speeding truck
we call melee.
This is a really large topic that's beyond the scope of a brief
answer here. In general I think the "melee owns casters" mantra is
too simplistic. As you point out, Frost mages generally do well in
3s and Enhancement shamans are not generally feared to the degree
rogues and DKS might be, so you already have to caveat it a
lot.
Q u o t e:
Question #3 Spellpower Plate
I'd have to say a good 80% of the people who raid WoW are really,
really sick of spellpower plate dropping in raids. When SP plate
drops one spec of one class can use this, which means you have 29
out of 30 disappointed specs. God forbid two pieces of spell power
plate drop from the same boss. The oft-suggested and effective fix
would probably have a passive talent trainable by Paladins to
convert Attack Power into Spellpower. I realize this would take
some rebalancing of Paladins, ensuring Holy Paladins had
mana(converted from Strength?) and roughly equivalent spellpower to
heal. The talents Sheath of Light and Guided by the Light would
probably need to be adjusted and maybe those spots in the talent
trees might be a good place, and this is just me brainstorming, to
have prot paladins run a little faster (they hardly need more
threat or another tanking CD, come 3.2) and give Ret paladins an
interrupt that they do honestly need.
We would like to get rid of spellpower plate, but we don't have a
great system yet to make loot work without it. We want Holy
paladins to wear plate and we don't want them to be great at say
damage or tanking without having to swap gear.
|
07/20/09 01:37:38 PM
Patch 3.1.3
Ghostcrawler
<Lead Systems Designer> |
Q u o t e:
Question #4: Tri Specs
Give us an inch, we'll ask for a mile. Now that we've had a taste
of the sweet life of dual specs, we realize how useful it is. And,
for this we thank you. But I know there are classes who would like
to experiment with the last tree of their class, or perhaps build a
pure pvp spec without the not-quite compromise of the guild who
require their hybrids to have both specs PvE optimized for raiding.
I don't really think this would totally break your raid style
encounters, do you? Any word on this?
Talent spec is still supposed to be meaningful. We don't want
characters to be swapping through talent specs the way they do gear
sets in Equipment Manager or your favorite mod. The Dual-spec
feature was intended to make it easier to flip between two
commonly-used specs. It wasn't supposed to make spec not a
commitment. It will be a long time, if ever, before we take this to
more than 2 specs.
Q u o t e:
Question #5
My fifth and final question is about haste scal...just kidding. I
don't I would be far wrong in saying the community as a whole would
really like something to do with our achievement points. This would
also make good business sense for you if you set the bar steep
enough. Something unique in game, such as our names written in gold
or perhaps a master ( in my case) priest class tag. Perhaps a
passenger mount that flies or a 2nd hearthstone location. Something
to do with our hard won achievement points I think would be a fun
addition to the game.
Achievements are not intended to improve player power. They are
supposed to be a totally optional path to achievement. Even though
they don't improve player power, they are still enormously popular,
so we don't think we need to do anything to make them more
enticing. Other games may use their achievements as a form of
character progression, but we think we've got that covered already
with things like character level, gear progression, reputations,
etc. The 310% speed mounts were an exception, but they've also been
an extremely controversial and problematic exception and I'm not
sure we'd handle that the same way if we could do it all
again.
We will continue to explore "vanity" or "prestige" rewards that
don't inflate character power. We still wouldn't require you to
spend points as a form of currency though. Generally, except for
tweaks we make to the system, achievement points should only go
up.
|
Blue colored topics are started by Blizzard Posters.
Topics are sorted descending based on their last update (last blue post) time.
You can find links to the orignal posts in the top-right corner of each post.
Update frequency is ~3 minutes.
Stats can be found here
|
|
